posted on 2021-11-14, 02:01authored bySothieson, Dhaxna
<p>In January 2012, the United States requested the assistance of the New Zealand government under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1992 (MACMA) to execute a search warrant at Kim Dotcom’s residence. A few months later, the High Court held that this warrant was invalid and its execution unlawful. The case illustrates the importance of effective cooperation between two executive authorities. This article will build on the case and argue that the flexibility of MACMA provisions must be used by domestic authorities to ensure that a request accords with domestic law and fulfils the purpose of the Act. The flexibility of these provisions are even more important to utilise under the new landscape of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012, enacted after Dotcom v Attorney-General, to ensure that New Zealand can register and enforce a foreign search warrant request.</p>
History
Copyright Date
2013-01-01
Date of Award
2013-01-01
Publisher
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington
Rights License
Author Retains Copyright
Degree Grantor
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington
Degree Name
LL.B. (Honours)
ANZSRC Type Of Activity code
970118 Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studies