Statelessness in Thailand is primarily framed first and foremost as an issue of legibility to the state, with an assumption that once a stateless person is ‘properly seen’, due recognition will follow. This article builds on a growing body of literature that examines the limits of evidentiary approach and the burden of proving citizenship as experienced by many stateless persons around the world. I use the anthropological framework of ‘state illegibility’ to encapsulate the systemic violence and burden placed on stateless persons by the state’s opaqueness and inscrutable, contradictory and unpredictable bureaucratic practices. Through three ethnographic accounts in Thailand, I interrogate various forms of state illegibility and their implications. I argue that by not recognising state illegibility, statelessness risks being reduced to an individualised legal status issue, rather than being acknowledged as a symptom of systemic discrimination.
History
Preferred citation
Cheva-Isarakul, J. (2019). 'Diagnosing' Statelessness and Everyday State Illegibility in Northern Thailand. The Statelessness and Citizenship Review,, 1(2), 214-238. https://statelessnessandcitizenshipreview.com/index.php/journal/article/view/53
Journal title
The Statelessness and Citizenship Review,
Volume
1
Issue
2
Publication date
2019-12-18
Pagination
214-238
Publisher
Peter McMullin Centre on Statelessness and The Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion