Taking subjectivity and reflexivity seriously: Implications of social constructionism for researching volunteer motivation
journal contributionposted on 2020-07-29, 23:17 authored by E Weenink, Todd BridgmanTodd Bridgman
© 2016, International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University. This paper explores the contributions a social constructionist paradigm can make for researching volunteer motivation, by reflecting on an active membership study of volunteer netball coaches at a New Zealand high school. Social constructionism is based on philosophical assumptions which differ from those of positivism and post-positivism, the dominant paradigms for understanding and representing volunteer motivation. It highlights the social processes through which people give meaning to their motives and view researchers as necessarily implicated in this meaning-making process. Through a critique of the extant literature on volunteer motivation and an illustration of the insights of social constructionism from our empirical study, we consider how volunteer motivation research could be different if subjectivity and reflexivity were taken more seriously.
Preferred citationWeenink, E. & Bridgman, T. N. (2017). Taking subjectivity and reflexivity seriously: Implications of social constructionism for researching volunteer motivation. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9824-y
Journal titleVoluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
Online publication date2016-12-19
volunteer researchmotivationsocial constructionismsportyouthVolunteer researchMotivationSocial constructionismSportYouthSocial SciencesSocial IssuesQUALITATIVE RESEARCHFUNCTIONAL-APPROACHQUESTIONSTHINKINGPolitical Science & Public AdministrationBusiness and ManagementPolicy and AdministrationSocial Work