Interference is a major impediment to the performance of a wireless network
as it has a significant adverse impact on Network Capacity. There has been a
gradual and consistent densification of WiFi networks due to Overlapping Basic
Service Set (OBSS) deployments. With the upcoming 802.11ax standards, dense and
ultra-dense deployments will become the norm and the detrimental impact of
Interference on Capacity will only exacerbate. However, the precise nature of
the association between Interference and Network Capacity remains to be
investigated, a gap we bridge in this work. We employ linear and polynomial
regression to find answers to several unexplored questions concerning the
Capacity Interference Relationship (CIR). We devise an algorithm to select
regression models that best explain this relationship by considering a variety
of factors including outlier threshold. We ascertain the statistical
significance of their association, and also determine the explainability of
variation in Network Capacity when Interference is varied, and vice versa.
While the relationship is generally believed to be non-linear, we demonstrate
that scenarios exist where a strong linear correlation exists between the two.
We also investigate the impact of WMN topology on this relationship by
considering four carefully designed Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) topologies in
the experiments. To quantify endemic Interference, we consider four popular
Theoretical Interference Estimation Metrics (TIEMs) viz., TID, CDALcost,
CXLSwt, and CALM. To ensure a sound regression analysis, we consider a large
set of 100 Channel Assignment (CA) schemes, a majority of which are generated
through a Generic Interference aware CA Generator proposed in this work.
Finally, we test the TIEMs in terms of their reliability and the ability to
model Interference. We carry out the experiments on IEEE 802.11g/n WMNs
simulated in ns-3.
History
Preferred citation
Kala, S. M., Seah, W. K. G., Sathya, V. & Lala, B. (2019). Statistical Relationship between Interference Estimates and Network Capacity. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1904.12125