Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand
journal contribution
posted on 2025-09-28, 20:30authored byThomas F Carlin, Tim Barnard, Toby Chapman, Justin Morgenroth, Daniel R Richards, Robyn Simcock, Jonathon Avery, Zoë Avery, Yvette Dickinson, Kate Elliot, Claire Freeman, Derek Hayes, Yolanda van Heezik, Kelly Hertzog, Rebecca Kiddle, Brent Martin, William Melville, Tipene Merritt, Colin Meurk, Tamara Mutu, Mirjam SchindlerMirjam Schindler, Alison Slade, David Spencer, Margaret C Stanley, David Stejskal, Mason Walker, Christopher Walsh, Sylvia Tapuke
Abstract
Urban forests provide numerous benefits including habitat for wildlife, improving human health, purifying air and water, and preventing and mitigating the effects of climate change. The need to protect and improve our urban forests will only increase as populations increase and cities densify and expand over time. However, urban forest establishment and maintenance is challenging due to a lack of effective policies, delays, lack of communication, inappropriate targets, and lack of recognition, disunity, or resourcing amongst stakeholders. Here we present the results from a joint urban forest symposium-workshop that sought to determine the priorities and challenges of different stakeholder groups in New Zealand, including arborists, ecologists, non-ecologist researchers, indigenous peoples, and planners. We synthesise these lessons as recommendations to improve urban forest planning, design, establishment, and minimise conflicts between stakeholder groups. While the highest priorities of each stakeholder group are fairly distinct, there are high levels of overlap in the general priorities and challenges they face in working towards advancing those priorities. We suggest a 3-phase framework to deliver progress that broadly considers (1) data collection, (2) policy development, and (3) resource development. We suggest this framework should be supported by continual monitoring and data sharing, an increased investment in green employment and education, and further recognition of urban foresters, indigenous communities, and ecologists. We suggest that an inclusive approach based on a shared understanding of forest values and removing barriers is most likely to result in long-term success.
Carlin, T. F., Barnard, T., Chapman, T., Morgenroth, J., Richards, D. R., Simcock, R., Avery, J., Avery, Z., Dickinson, Y., Elliot, K., Freeman, C., Hayes, D., van Heezik, Y., Hertzog, K., Kiddle, R., Martin, B., Melville, W., Merritt, T., Meurk, C.,... Tapuke, S. (2025). Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand. Urban Ecosystems, 28(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-025-01801-8