On the relative importance of excluded minors

Hall, R; Mayhew, Dillon; Van Zwam, Stefan

doi:10.25455/wgtn.17078327.v1

ON THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EXCLUDED MINORS.pdf (233.82 kB)

Download file

On the relative importance of excluded minors

journal contribution

posted on 2021-11-25, 00:54 authored by R Hall, Dillon MayhewDillon Mayhew, Stefan Van Zwam

If E is a set of matroids, then EX(E) denotes the set of matroids that have no minor isomorphic to a member of E. If E′ E, we say that E′ is superfluous if EX(E-E′)-EX(E) contains only finitely many 3-connected matroids. We determine the superfluous subsets of six well-known collections of excluded minors. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.

History

Preferred citation

Hall, R., Mayhew, D. & Van Zwam, S. (2013). On the relative importance of excluded minors. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 50(1), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2012.08.007

Publisher DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2012.08.007

Journal title

Advances in Applied Mathematics

Volume

50

Issue

1

Publication date

2013-01-01

Pagination

228-242

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Publication status

Published

Contribution type

Article

ISSN

0196-8858

eISSN

1090-2074

Language

en

On the relative importance of excluded minors

History

Preferred citation

Publisher DOI

Journal title

Volume

Issue

Publication date

Pagination

Publisher

Publication status

Contribution type

ISSN

eISSN

Language

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports