- No file added yet -
On the relative importance of excluded minors
journal contribution
posted on 2021-11-25, 00:54 authored by R Hall, Dillon Mayhew, Stefan Van ZwamIf E is a set of matroids, then EX(E) denotes the set of matroids that have no minor isomorphic to a member of E. If E′ E, we say that E′ is superfluous if EX(E-E′)-EX(E) contains only finitely many 3-connected matroids. We determine the superfluous subsets of six well-known collections of excluded minors. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.
History
Preferred citation
Hall, R., Mayhew, D. & Van Zwam, S. (2013). On the relative importance of excluded minors. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 50(1), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2012.08.007Publisher DOI
Journal title
Advances in Applied MathematicsVolume
50Issue
1Publication date
2013-01-01Pagination
228-242Publisher
Elsevier BVPublication status
PublishedContribution type
ArticleISSN
0196-8858eISSN
1090-2074Language
enUsage metrics
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC