Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington
Browse

Methods in causal inference. Part 3: measurement error and external validity threats

Download (3.67 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-11, 03:07 authored by Joseph BulbuliaJoseph Bulbulia
The human sciences should seek generalisations wherever possible. For ethical and scientific reasons, it is desirable to sample more broadly than ‘Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic’ (WEIRD) societies. However, restricting the target population is sometimes necessary; for example, young children should not be recruited for studies on elderly care. Under which conditions is unrestricted sampling desirable or undesirable? Here, we use causal diagrams to clarify the structural features of measurement error bias and target population restriction bias (or ‘selection restriction’), focusing on threats to valid causal inference that arise in comparative cultural research. We define any study exhibiting such biases, or confounding biases, as weird (wrongly estimated inferences owing to inappropriate restriction and distortion). We explain why statistical tests such as configural, metric and scalar invariance cannot address the structural biases of weird studies. Overall, we examine how the workflows for causal inference provide the necessary preflight checklists for ambitious, effective and safe comparative cultural research.

History

Preferred citation

Bulbulia, J. A. (2024). Methods in causal inference. Part 3: measurement error and external validity threats. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 6, e42-. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2024.33

Journal title

Evolutionary Human Sciences

Volume

6

Publication date

2024-10-01

Pagination

e42

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Publication status

Published

Online publication date

2024-10-01

ISSN

2513-843X

eISSN

2513-843X

Article number

e42

Language

en