Knowledge guardianship, custodianship and ethics: a Melanesian perspective
journal contribution
posted on 2020-08-21, 02:39 authored by Kabini SangaKabini Sanga, Martyn Reynolds© The Author(s) 2020. Across the world, knowledge communities categorise and attach conditions of guardianship to different kinds of knowledge. For private or secret knowledge, those responsible for its care have obligations for arranging and restricting transmission to ensure community survival. While an insider/outsider positionality is often used to navigate this knowledge area, a binary approach is unhelpful. Taking a more relational reading of positionality, we support a dynamic understanding of the transmission of restricted knowledge, using relevant principles of guardianship or custodianship. Based on a Melanesian Solomon Islands tribe, the study sketches a set of principles and shows how they operate in practice. Our intents are to honour the contribution that Melanesian thought makes to rethinking research dichotomies regarding secret knowledge, that readers appreciate the dynamic nature of knowledge guardianship, and that this case study enhances the discussion on ethical entitlement to, or restriction of, Indigenous knowledge in the Pacific region and beyond.
History
Preferred citation
Sanga, K. & Reynolds, M. (2020). Knowledge guardianship, custodianship and ethics: a Melanesian perspective. AlterNative, 16(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120917481Publisher DOI
Journal title
AlterNativeVolume
16Issue
2Publication date
2020-06-01Pagination
99-107Publisher
SAGE PublicationsPublication status
PublishedOnline publication date
2020-05-04ISSN
1177-1801eISSN
1174-1740Language
enUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC