Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington
Browse
- No file added yet -

Glottonyms, anachronism and ambiguity in scholarly depictions of Juraj Križanić/Юрий Крижанич

Download (801.92 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-08-19, 00:46 authored by Alexander MaxwellAlexander Maxwell
This article is a case study in the politics of glottonyms. Most glottonyms are also ethnonyms; that is, the name of a linguistic variety is usually the name of an ethnographic collective, typically or stereotypically a 'nation'. The Russian language, for example, shares its name with the Russians; the Croatian language with the Croats, and so on. Of course, 'nations' and 'languages' do not always coincide, despite the naive tendency to equate them by default. Both ethnonyms and glottonyms contain great complexity and any search for discrepancies is rapidly successful. Nevertheless, the very act of referring to a linguistic variety with an ethnonym encourages their conflation.

History

Preferred citation

Maxwell, A. (2020). Glottonyms, anachronism and ambiguity in scholarly depictions of Juraj Križanić/Юрий Крижанич. Slavonic and East European Review, 98(2), 201-235. https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.98.2.0201

Journal title

Slavonic and East European Review

Volume

98

Issue

2

Publication date

2020-04-01

Pagination

201-235

Publisher

Project Muse

Publication status

Published

ISSN

0037-6795

eISSN

2222-4327

Usage metrics

    Journal articles

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC