Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington

File(s) stored somewhere else

Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.

Framing 'digital well-being' as a social good

Version 2 2021-02-17, 06:03
Version 1 2020-12-07, 01:08
journal contribution
posted on 2021-02-17, 06:03 authored by Alex Beattie, Michael Daubs
This contribution argues that companies such as Apple, Facebook, and Google are increasingly incorporating features that supposedly promote “digital well-being” to forestall regulation of their platforms and services. The inclusion of these features, such as Apple’s Screen Time, frames these commercial platforms as providing a social good by promising to encourage more “intentional” or “mindful” use of social media and mobile devices. As a result, oft-critiqued platforms are increasingly adopting the language of their critics in order to frame themselves as a social good. This strategy mimics that used by radio executives in the United States in the early twentieth century, where the medium developed as a predominantly commercial enterprise. To avoid regulation, it became necessary to perpetuate the perception that commercial broadcasters were also a social good that fulfilled a public service function. Platforms today, we assert, are inadvertently or purposefully adopting a similar tactic to position themselves as leaders in a developing digital wellness market in the hopes of avoiding future governmental regulation.


Preferred citation

Daubs, M. & Beattie, A. (2020). Framing 'digital well-being' as a social good. First Monday, 25(12).

Journal title

First Monday





Publication date



University of Illinois

Publication status

Published online

Contribution type


Online publication date