File(s) stored somewhere else

Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.

Enhancing long-term governance - Parliament's vital oversight role

journal contribution
posted on 16.07.2020 by Jonathan Boston, David Bagnall, Anna Barry
This article explores how the New Zealand Parliament scrutinises the quality of long-term governance and considers how such scrutiny could be made more systematic, proactive and rigorous. The analysis is based, among other things, on extensive interviews with current and former MPs and other active participants in the policy process. Interviewees were generally critical of the existing system of parliamentary scrutiny: it was variously described as ‘weak’, ‘inadequate’, ‘cursory’, ‘patchy’ and ‘unduly partisan’. Scrutiny of long-term matters – such as governments’ strategies, foresight, planning and risk management – was seen as inferior, on average, to other forms of scrutiny, especially the scrutiny of legislation. Drawing on the suggestions of interviewees and the experience of legislatures in several other parliamentary democracies, we outline and assess various options for parliamentary reform.

History

Preferred citation

Boston, J., Bagnall, D. & Barry, A. (2020). Enhancing long-term governance - Parliament's vital oversight role. Policy Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v16i1.6354

Journal title

Policy Quarterly

Publication date

01/01/2020

Publication status

Published

Contribution type

Article

Exports

Logo branding

Exports