Stance and modals of obligation and necessity in academic writing.pdf (1.29 MB)
0/0

Stance and modals of obligation and necessity in academic writing

Download (1.29 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 06.06.2020 by Jean Parkinson
Abstract Variation has been demonstrated in modal use between written and spoken registers and between disciplines. This article investigates variation within a discipline by comparing modals of obligation and necessity used in three science genres. Obligation modals project strong authoritative stance, thus contrasting with the tendency in academic writing towards tentativeness. The modal auxiliaries must and should and quasi-modals have to and need to are investigated using student writing from the BAWE (British Academic Written English) corpus and a corpus of published research articles. Findings include a dearth of obligation modals in the empirical genres (research articles and laboratory reports). Also a greater prominence was found of dynamic modal meaning (where necessity arises from circumstances) rather than deontic meaning (where the necessity arises from human authority or rules). A further finding is the prominence of objective meaning in the science register compared with the International Corpus of English (Collins 2009a).

History

Preferred citation

Parkinson, J. (2020). Stance and modals of obligation and necessity in academic writing. Register Studies, 2(1), 102-130. https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18012.par

Journal title

Register Studies

Volume

2

Issue

1

Publication date

10/04/2020

Pagination

102-130

Publisher

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Publication status

Published

Online publication date

10/04/2020

ISSN

2542-9477

eISSN

2542-9485

Language

en

Exports

Logo branding

Categories

Exports