File(s) stored somewhere else

Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.

Ameliorating the collateral damage caused by collateral attack in administrative law

journal contribution
posted on 14.09.2020, 20:26 by Dean Knight
Collateral attack is the indirect challenge of administrative decisions, instruments or actions in civil and criminal proceedings for the purpose of determining private rights. Collateral challenges are a common way litigants seek to contest actions of the executive or other public bodies, and represent a different mechanism for the courts to exercise their supervisory jurisdiction over administrative action. The New Zealand courts have adopted a straightforward approach to the doctrine of collateral attack, generally allowing such challenges. This paper explores the principles that underlie the doctrine of collateral attack and the potential difficulties that the doctrine creates. It is argued that the courts should take a more principled approach to determining whether collateral attack should be allowed in any individual case. A number of "touchstones" are proposed to ameliorate any collateral damage to administrative law's unique character while still ensuring that people are able to challenge the invalidity of administrative instruments, decisions or actions as and when they arise in civil and criminal proceedings

History

Preferred citation

Knight, D. (2006). Ameliorating the collateral damage caused by collateral attack in administrative law. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 4, 117-146. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1409926

Journal title

New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law

Volume

4

Publication date

01/01/2006

Pagination

117-146

Publication status

Published

Contribution type

Article

Exports

Logo branding

Categories

Exports